Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Top Stories

Editor's Pick

Marvel, artist’s estate ask for pre-trial wins in superhero copyright fight

A PERSON dressed as the character Spiderman attends the premiere of the film Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness in Los Angeles, US, May 2, 2022. — Reuters

WALT Disney Co.’s Marvel and the estate of artist Steve Ditko both asked a Manhattan federal judge on Friday to hand them a win without waiting for trial in their copyright dispute over rights to superheroes Spider-Man and Doctor Strange. Marvel urged the court to reject the estate’s effort to reclaim Mr. Ditko’s interest in the characters, arguing he co-created them on the company’s behalf. Mr. Ditko’s estate argued that he developed his heroes and stories independently, and that Marvel intentionally avoided hiring him because of the “dire state of its business” at the time.

Representatives for Marvel and Mr. Ditko’s estate did not immediately respond to requests for comment Monday. Mr. Ditko died in 2018.

Under the Copyright Act, a creator can terminate a copyright assignment after decades under certain circumstances. Marvel in 2021 sued Mr. Ditko’s estate and several other artists who wrote and illustrated comics in the 1950s, ’60s, and ’70s in response to their bids to terminate copyrights they granted to Marvel related to characters including Iron Man, Ant-Man, and Thor.

The termination law does not apply to works made for hire, which Marvel said prevents the artists from recovering the rights. It argued Friday that the case record showed Mr. Ditko worked under Marvel editor-in-chief Stan Lee “subject to Lee’s editorial discretion.”

“Ditko was accorded some creative freedom in how Lee’s story would manifest on paper, but Lee maintained ultimate control over the pages,” Marvel said.

Marvel compared the lawsuit to a similar case it won at a US appeals court in 2013 involving illustrator Jack Kirby. That case was settled in 2014 as the US Supreme Court was set to consider whether to take it up.

Mr. Ditko’s estate argued that he was a freelancer for Marvel.

“Ditko, an extremely independent-minded artist, supervised himself, edited his own work, and created the works after little or no discussion with Lee,” it said.

The estate also said Ditko could not have legally created the works on behalf of the Marvel “shell companies” that registered the copyrights, which it called the “Achilles’ heel” of Marvel’s work-for-hire argument. — Reuters

You May Also Like

Editor's Pick

THE BOARD of directors of Ayala-led ACEN Corp. has approved the availing of credit facilities amounting to about P7.8 billion from two financial institutions....

Editor's Pick

STOCK PHOTO Image by StockSnap from Pixabay HYDERABAD – When Saloni Singh was little, she would beg then brawl with her brother for a turn on...

Editor's Pick

HOLCIM PHILIPPINES FACEBOOK PAGE LOCAL cement manufacturer Holcim Philippines, Inc. has partnered with South Korean cement and concrete producer Sungshin Cement Co. Ltd. to...

Editor's Pick

MPIC Metro Pacific Investments Corp. (MPIC) reported on Wednesday a consolidated core net income of P4.3 billion in the first quarter, up 38% from...

Disclaimer:, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice.
The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Copyright © 2022 Secrets Of Richdads. All Rights Reserved.