Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Top Stories

Editor's Pick

NASA unlikely to send crew to moon until 2026 or later — watchdog

WASHINGTON — A US government watchdog on Monday said NASA failed to accurately estimate the cost of returning astronauts to the moon and forecast the space agency would not likely complete the mission until “2026 at the earliest.”

Last week NASA extended its target date to 2025 at the earliest in its Artemis program, an initiative launched by former President Donald Trump’s administration with an initial goal of returning humans to the lunar surface by 2024.

NASA’s inspector general said it found NASA “lacks a comprehensive and accurate cost estimate that accounts for all Artemis program costs.” Artemis is meant as a stepping stone toward a greater objective of sending astronauts to Mars.

The report found NASA uses a rough estimate for the first three missions “that excludes $25 billion for key activities related to planned missions beyond Artemis III.”

It said NASA must identify ways to reduce costs. It said NASA was likely to spend $93 billion on the program through 2025 and faced a $4.1 billion cost-per-launch for at least its first four Artemis missions.

In a written response NASA said it had restructured its Human Exploration and Operations Mission Directorate organization to ensure effective management and that it agreed it should look for “measurable cost reduction targets” for its Exploration Systems Development.

NASA Administrator Bill Nelson cited delays from legal wrangling over a contract with Elon Musk’s SpaceX to build the Artemis lunar landing vehicle as a major reason for extending the target date.

A federal judge on Nov. 4 rejected a lawsuit by Jeff Bezos’ space company Blue Origin against the US government challenging NASA’s decision to award a $2.9-billion lunar lander contract to SpaceX.

As additional reasons for extending the target date, Mr. Nelson cited Congress for having approved too little money for the program and the Trump administration for having set a 2024 target that was not feasible. — Reuters

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Editor's Pick

The Board of Investments (BoI) has cleared Sinoma Energy Conservation (Cebu) Waste Heat Recovery Co. Inc. to serve as the operator of a 4.5-megawatt...

Forex

At a time when the world is battling to get through the dreaded coronavirus pandemic, protective face masks have come out to be the...

Editor's Pick

BEWARE the “lessons of history” as drawn by charlatans, ignoramuses, or tyrants, for they will be daft, wrong, and possibly disastrous. The self-serving amateur...

Editor's Pick

The world’s food-import bill is set to jump even more than expected to a record this year, increasing the threat of hunger, especially in...

Disclaimer: SecretsOfRichDads.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice.
The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Copyright © 2022 Secrets Of Richdads. All Rights Reserved.