Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Top Stories

Editor's Pick

Are US firms ready to do more than voice concerns on trans rights?

Image via Ted Eytan/Flickr/CC BY-SA 2.0

NEW YORK — Leading US companies have become more vocal in criticizing proposed laws restricting transgender rights and taking a stand on LGBT+ issues but have failed so far to take concrete action against states with such legislation, advocates said.

Nearly 100 companies, including Facebook, Pfizer, and Dell, said late last month they were “deeply concerned” about a slew of trans-related legislative proposals presented recently in conservative states, calling the bills “discriminatory.”

Anne Lieberman, director of policy and programs at Athlete Ally, a US-based nonprofit LGBT+ athletic advocacy group, said the joint statement underscored the broader willingness of American corporations to step into the political arena.

“Since George Floyd’s murder over the summer, that was really a moment … where you saw businesses across the country really taking a strong stance in wading into political water in ways they haven’t done before,” Ms. Lieberman said.

Republican lawmakers have introduced a record 175 bills in at least 32 states on trans issues so far this year, according to Human Rights Campaign (HRC), the country’s largest LGBT+ advocacy group.

Most of the legislative proposals seek to stop trans girls and women from competing in school sports, and to restrict children’s access to gender transition-related medical care.

Proponents of the measures say they want to protect young people from medical procedures they could later regret and have voiced concerns that trans athletes have a physical edge that disadvantages girls and women.

It is not the first time big companies have taken a stand on LGBT+ rights issues. Last year, 36 firms signed a statement condemning a Tennessee law allowing adoption agencies to turn away LGBT+ couples on religious grounds.

“The sheer volume of businesses that engage is higher,” said Jessica Shortall, director of corporate engagement at Freedom For All Americans, an LGBT+ advocacy group that coordinated the statement with HRC.

“And honestly, practically speaking, there’s strength and safety in numbers,” Ms. Shortall added.


The business community’s stance against conservative trans legislation came soon after leading companies spoke out against US state voting curbs that activist groups say unfairly target Black and other racial minorities.

Apple,, and Starbucks were among more than 100 companies to sign a letter in April opposing “any discriminatory legislation or measures that restrict or prevent any eligible voter from having an equal and fair opportunity to cast a ballot.”

Still, some trans rights advocates want business leaders to take a stronger line — as some companies did in North Carolina after the state passed the so-called “bathroom bill” in 2016.

The legislation banned trans citizens from using the public restrooms that correspond with their gender identity, prompting companies including PayPal, Adidas and Deutsche Bank to axe expansion plans in the state.

In an open letter in April, the HRC advocacy group urged companies to refuse new business in states where trans athletes were barred from competing and pull their support from sporting events where trans athletes cannot compete.

“Although we certainly appreciate those efforts, they are not enough,” the letter said.

More recently, Jennifer Pritzker — the world’s first trans billionaire and a Republican — has threatened to move her family’s business out of Tennessee due to a range of restrictive trans-related bills, several of which have passed.

Despite the dozens of proposals presented this year, so far only Arkansas, Tennessee, Mississippi, and South Dakota have pushed through measures banning trans women and girls from playing in female sports.

Idaho passed a similar law last year that has been blocked by federal court.

Last month, Kansas Governor Laura Kelly, a Democrat, and North Dakota Governor Doug Burgum, a Republican, vetoed bills in their states that aim to restrict trans athletes, with Kelly calling her state’s version of the bill “regressive.”

Both chambers of Arkansas’s state legislature passed a measure that would have made the state the first in the country to criminally punish doctors for providing certain types of care to trans youth.

Arkansas Governor Asa Hutchinson, a Republican, vetoed the bill shortly afterwards, saying it would be “vast government overreach,” however his veto was overturned by the legislature.

But despite the reprieve in some states, more such bills are bound to become law — particularly if lawmakers do not fear repercussions for their local economies, Ms. Lieberman said.

“Money, not morals, shifts the conversation far too often,” said Ms. Lieberman. — Matthew Lavietes/Thomson Reuters Foundation

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Top News

Nikola, an electric truck startup, saw its stock price fly high as it went public and announced a deal with General Motors. A damning...


Stock Markets8 minutes ago (Jul 31, 2020 07:50PM ET) (C) Reuters. FILE PHOTO: James Murdoch, the son of media mogul Rupert Murdoch, and his...

Editor's Pick

TikTok is one of the most rapidly growing platform. People across all the spectrum of age, gender, communities are joining the platform to...

Top News

SEC probing Nikola Motors over short-seller claims of fraud – Business Insider Business Insider logoThe words “Business Insider”. 2020-09-14T23:20:04Z Massimo Pinca/Reuters The Securities and...

Disclaimer:, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice.
The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Copyright © 2021 Secrets Of Richdads. All Rights Reserved.

    Get the daily email that makes reading the news actually enjoyable. Stay informed and entertained, for free.

    Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!